Wednesday, January 28, 2015

WHERE HAVE YOU GONE NORMAN DALE? (With Apologies to Simon and Garfunkel)

I had a discussion recently with members of a Division 1 basketball team who were lamenting the fact that the selfish play and me-first attitude of a number of their teammates has impacted the team's ability to win some win-able games. The things they mentioned ranged from players whose primary game-time focus is on improving their personal stats to teammates who are disrespectful to coaches (including foul language and shoving coaches). 

On two other occasions I was told by European big men on college teams that making good passes is something they always prided themselves on, but here in the States they found that if they passed the ball they weren't likely to get it back.

Five guys playing as one team – with all that entails – has on many an occasion resulted in a victory over a team with greater talent.  If I were writing this column for coaches (for so many of whom the capacity for building a team-first culture seems to be rather elusive) I would propose that the player who showed the greatest team-first mentality in a game be freed from running suicides for a week. I am pretty certain that this would send home the message.

Any fan of the movie “Hoosiers” (based on the true story of how an unlikely team from small town Milan, Indiana made it all the way to the 1954 Indiana High School basketball State Finals where they beat power house Muncie Central to win the state title) will remember how early in the film Coach Norman Dale (played by Gene Hackman) was willing to remove ANY player from the team – no matter how talented or seemingly irreplaceable – who could not or would not accept the team-first approach.  EVERY coach preaches this but how many back it up with consequential actions. Admittedly a coach's job is on the line, but most seem focused on short term gains ( a win here or there) over building a long-term core value of team success first).

Since I am writing this column for players, however, let me offer a few thoughts to those of you who find yourself in a position similar to that of the players mentioned at the outset.

While there is nothing wrong with vigilantly pursuing your own welfare, ask yourself if you are allowing the situation on your team to affect your attitude. It will be tempting to follow the norm and let your own ego needs come first, and become another player who looks to shoot first no matter the situation.  However, you can use the opportunity to become a smarter player. When you have the ball, if the best move is to shoot or drive to the hole then do that. But if the best move is pass to an open teammate then LET that prevail over the wish to take the shot.

Even if no one else notices, you will be making improvement in your decision making ability.

Another think you can do is make a check list of things that are representative of team-oriented play, and then rate yourself on those behaviors. Doing this over a period of time will heighten your awareness of these things (whether it is setting a good screen, cheering loudly from the bench, or diving for loose balls).

One thing that could prove instrumental in shifting things a bit is to take note of moments of team-oriented play by your more selfish teammate, and comment on them afterwards. It is a subtle way of reinforcing the kind of behavior you think is best for the team overall.

We all like praise and if a teammate is being praised for certain things he is likely to repeat them. Obviously you want to show some subtlety, so instead of saying something like “You are always looking to shoot but I like that you passed to John when he was open” you may say something like “That was a great pass to John that set him up perfectly for the bucket.”

Maybe there are others on the team who feel the way you do. If a couple of you are being vocal with these kinds of comments it might help. The bottom line is that complaining or feeling sorry for yourself, while understandable, is likely to underscore your feelings of being a “victim” rather than a problem solver. So staying positive is the key.

Nearly two thousand years ago the Jewish sage Hillel noted:
“If I am not for myself, who will be for me?
But if I am only for myself, what am I?”


For the athlete who believes in himself as a strong competitor and who cares about what it takes for his team to compete at their full potential, those ancient words still bear up today.